M855a1 legal to own


  • AP Ammo – Are armor piercing bullets legal?
  • The Tortured Path of the Army’s M855A1 AR-15 Round
  • Ammunition Regulation in New York
  • Is M855A1 legal?
  • The Evolution of 5.56 Ball – A Look Then and Now (M855A1)
  • AP Ammo – Are armor piercing bullets legal?

    We first mentioned the EPR in a blog post here. Marx contacted individuals at the Department of Defense to share his design for a new, lead-free 5. Marx, the Army was able to copy the design and give it to unauthorized recipients, including some who worked with vendors of ammunition to the Army. The presiding judge in the case, Charles F.

    Also, Lettow awarded to Liberty a 1. The Army and other military branches and agencies ordered more than million of the MA1 rounds in fiscal , and Army budget documents from showed plans to purchase at least 65 million MA1 rounds in fiscal Other greening efforts include 5.

    No question, the M has its critics. The M incorporated a hardened steel penetrator; a lead slug; and a forward-drawn copper jacket, and had a weight of 62 grains when it became the standard NATO ammunition. Post-combat reports and surveys in the s said that some soldiers were reporting instances of through-and-through hits on enemy combatants who would return fire despite being struck by the standard ammunition.

    In doing so, the bullet transfers all of its energy within that target, which increases the severity of tissue damage and therefore, the likelihood of incapacitation. Conversely, at a low angle of yaw, the bullet may pass through a soft target. The MA1 steel penetrator is effective against light armored targets while its three-piece construction maintains operational capabilities against unprotected personnel targets.

    The MA1 enhances performance on hard targets or barriers, and contains an improved propellant that reduces flash. Deeper seating in the casing can contribute to higher chamber pressures. Liberty makes its National Defense 5.

    Weight is 62 grains, and it produces 3, fps of muzzle velocity. Accuracy is claimed to be greater than 2 minutes of angle MOA meters. Liberty says the ND 5. The MA1 is listed as having a muzzle velocity of 3, fps compared to 3, for the M Do you think it lives up to its billing? Let us hear about your experiences with it in the field or at the range. Share this:.

    The Tortured Path of the Army’s M855A1 AR-15 Round

    The same is true for rifle rounds. In September of , a grain Remington designed bullet on the. Military service rifles are not match grade and typically neither is ball ammunition. The M rounds featured a grain FMJ bullet leaving the M16 muzzle at a respectable fps and a chamber pressure of psi.

    Large quantities of the M load are still produced today for foreign military sales, and XM, the civilian version was widely available until the ammunition shortages of The M ball ammunition delivered as promised for many years of service. However, the armed forces wanted a round that delivered greater down range penetration performance.

    So, the hunt was on for a replacement for the M ball round. The M round which can be identified by its green painted tip features a grain bullet comprised of a lead core with a steel penetrator insert all wrapped up within its copper jacket.

    Steel penetrator can be seen atop the lead core of the M round. Except for the green painted tip, the M still looks like conventional ball ammunition. The steel penetrator gave the Army the added punch it was looking for on hard targets at a distance. The heavier grain bullet was however moving at a slower velocity and required a faster twist barrel to stabilize it.

    Shortcomings were identified and political influences dictated that there needed to be improvements. More consistent performance was desired on both hard and soft targets, along with addressing environmental concerns.

    M posting respectable velocities from The troops and the environment benefited from the fielding of the MA1 in So right now, you might be wondering where I am going with this history lesson. Well, the event that set this article in motion was running across and purchasing a couple of stripper clips of MA1 at a recent gun and collector show. The new green round-environmentally that is, compared to older M Improved performance was an obvious goal, but exactly what did that mean?

    The MA1 projectile still weighs 62 grains but it is a lead-free projectile. The design was intended to improve performance on hard and soft targets and reduce environmental impacts.

    M showed outstanding yard accuracy 1 inch paster Performance Comparison For comparison, all three ammunition types, M, M, and MA1 were shot out of a The M clearly demonstrated the best accuracy and excluding the one flyer would have been close to 1 Minute of Angle MOA , approaching match accuracy. Even with ball ammunition, the troops need to be able to hit the targets. Not quite the match accuracy touted in the Army program brief yards.

    The small sample size I had found made it a one and done for each stage of testing. Obviously, more shooting would have presented a better picture of what averages could provide. However, they did shine while flying across the chronograph.

    XM averaging over fps from a The grain bullet of the XM posted the fastest average speed, but only 28 fps faster than the heavier MA1 bullet. MA1 was over fps faster than M and almost reaching fps from a carbine.

    The A1 round certainly stretches the envelope and pushes the limits in meeting that goal. Consider for a moment that the A1 projectile has the same grain weight as the M, but being lead free, the materials are lighter, so the bullet is actually longer in length. The overall length of the cartridge is the same, so the A1 projectile sits deeper in the case than the M or M meaning it has less case volume for powder. Close up of MA1 penetrator on copper core.

    Less case volume and over fps higher velocity definitely means higher case and chamber pressures. I could feel a noticeable increase in recoil when firing the A1 ammunition, not that a has much, but the difference was clear.

    One possible drawback to the MA1 is that the increased velocity and pressures are rumored to decrease bolt and barrel life. However, it is important that ammunition used by the troops has adequate capability against hard surfaces that enemy combatants may use such as car doors, walls, or other structures used for cover. Neither the M nor the M penetrated the plate.

    I also shot an AR plate at yards with all three ammunitions. AR is commonly used for rifle targets and is similar in nature to some armor plating. The difference in impact damage on the AR plates clearly demonstrated that the MA1 was packing the most punch of the three ball ammunitions tested, though none came close to penetrating even at yards..

    Though only a ball round the MA1 damaged this AR plate yards. The A1 round was definitely the hands-down winner on both steel targets. That added velocity along with the larger arrowhead-shaped steel penetrator certainly increased the downrange performance on hard targets.

    Another important goal was to increase performance against soft targets. A few more rounds and I would have done some additional testing against some car doors and windshields, these are barriers that typically see ball ammunition fail miserably.

    However, I think the A1 would have done better than anything I have previously tested. The environment is also a big winner, as there are tons less lead being deposited on training ranges throughout the armed forces and less lead exposure during manufacturing.

    Ammunition Regulation in New York

    Weight is 62 grains, and it produces 3, fps of muzzle velocity. Accuracy is claimed to be greater than 2 minutes of angle MOA meters.

    Liberty says the ND 5.

    Is M855A1 legal?

    The MA1 is listed as having a muzzle velocity of 3, fps compared to 3, for the M Do you think it lives up to its billing? Let us hear about your experiences with it in the field or at the range. Share this:. The overall length of the cartridge is the same, so the A1 projectile sits deeper in the case gckey revoked the M or M meaning it has less case volume for powder.

    Close up of MA1 penetrator on copper core. Less case volume and over fps higher velocity definitely means higher case and chamber pressures. I could feel a noticeable increase in recoil when firing the A1 ammunition, not that a has much, but the difference was clear.

    One possible drawback to the MA1 is that the increased velocity and pressures are rumored to decrease bolt and barrel life. However, it is important that ammunition used by the troops has adequate capability against hard surfaces that enemy combatants may use such as car doors, walls, or other structures used for cover.

    Neither the M nor the M penetrated the plate. I also shot an AR plate at yards with all three ammunitions. AR is commonly used for rifle targets and is similar in nature to some armor plating.

    The difference in impact damage on the AR plates clearly demonstrated that the MA1 was packing the most punch of the three ball ammunitions tested, though none came close to penetrating even at yards.

    Though only a ball round the MA1 damaged this AR plate yards. The A1 round was definitely the hands-down winner on both steel targets. That added velocity along with the larger arrowhead-shaped steel penetrator certainly increased the downrange performance on hard targets.

    Another important goal was to increase performance against soft targets. A few more rounds and I would have done some additional testing against some car doors and windshields, these are barriers that typically see ball ammunition fail miserably. However, I think the A1 would have done better than anything I have previously tested.

    The environment is also a big winner, as there are tons less lead being deposited on training ranges throughout the armed forces and less lead exposure during manufacturing.

    The last reliable info I had was that the MA1 is the best ammo with mixed armor and body damage besides the M The M however is very limited and sold within 5 seconds of trader reset, so people use the second best, highly available ammo.

    The Evolution of 5.56 Ball – A Look Then and Now (M855A1)

    In my opinion and my view it gives a good spread of both damage and pen. What is MA1? The MA1, a 5. Why do special forces use MP5? The MP5 is a 9mm sub machine gun. MP5s, of one flavor or another, are still used by US SOF units, particularly for personal protection and covert operations. What rifle do SAS use?

    Recoil-operated, semi-automatic anti-materiel rifle. Do police use MP5?


    thoughts on “M855a1 legal to own

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *