Tesla valve


  • Tesla’s Valvular Conduit
  • Tesla Valve
  • 100-Year-Old Tesla Valve Is Cool But Not Well Suited For Industry
  • Burning Propane Beautifully Illustrates How A Tesla Valve Works
  • Tesla Valve Design Optimization in SimScale
  • tesla valve
  • Tesla’s Valvular Conduit

    Go to Turbulence panel 2. Select RANS modeling 3. Transport Properties - Water As a fluid material, we will use water. Go to Transport Properties panel 2. Open Material Database 3. Pick up water from the list 4. At any time we will still be able to overwrite these values. Go to Solution panel 2. Increase the Non-Orthogonal Correctors to 5 This option usually improves stability and convergence but at an additional computational cost due to solving pressure equations multiple times. Solution - Residuals We will decrease residual levels for pressure.

    We do not need to decrease the residual level for other variables because the pressure equation is usually the one converging last. Switch to the Residuals tab 2. Change the pressure residual to p 1e Solution - Limits Velocity Dumping can prevent the solver from diverging even if nonphysical velocity would appear during the iterations. Switch to the Limits tab 2. Check the Velocity Damping Boundary Conditions We are simulating one segment of a periodic geometry, where values at the inlet and outlet of the domain are bounded by the cyclic constraint.

    In this case, we can not force fluid flow by using a standard approach, but we will use pressure jump instead. This boundary condition will force constant pressure difference between coupled boundaries. Go to Boundary Conditions panel 2. In this case, you will have to apply the pressure difference with an opposite sign.

    The Jump value input appears only on master boundary, which is the first boundary in the coupling. Monitors — Sampling I During calculation, we can observe intermediate results on a section plane. To add sampling data on a plane we need to define plane properties and also select fields that will be sampled.

    Note that runtime post-processing can only be defined before starting calculations and can not be changed later on. Go to Monitors panel 2. Switch to Sampling tab 3. Select Create Slice 4. Set slice plane location Point [m] 0. Monitors — Sampling II Additionally to specifying section plane geometry we need to choose which results should be sampled on the surface.

    Expand Fields list 2. Select pressure p, velocity U and turbulence kinetic energy k Run - Time Control Finally, we can start our computation. Go to RUN panel 2. Set the maximum Number of Iteration to The free version allows you to use only 2 processors in parallel mode. To get the full version, you can use the contact form to Request day Trial Estimated computation time for 2 processors: 3 minutes 1.

    Switch to CPU tab 2. Use parallel mode 3. Increase the Number of processors 4. Click Run Simulation button Discretization - Convection After preliminary calculation, we will continue with a more accurate algorithm. Change velocity discretization to the Linear Upwind scheme to minimize numerical diffusion affecting the results of the simulation.

    Go to the Discretization panel 2. Switch to Convection tab 3. Click on Upwind to extend the list 4. Change scheme to Linear Upwind Run - Continue Simulation Move back to Run panel and continue calculation. Note we did not remove the previous result but we use them as a starting point for computation with a higher-order scheme. Click Continue Simulation button Residuals When the calculation is finished we should see a similar residual plot. Note that we can see how residual values get up when we have changed the convection scheme.

    This is due to the fact that different numerical scheme results in slightly different discrete equations which do not match results from previous calculations. Slice - Velocity Field Slices tab appears next to the Residuals tab. Under this tab, we can preview results on the defined section plane. Change tab to Slices 2. Select the velocity U 3.

    Click Adjust range to data Calculate - Mass Flow Rate Finaly we will calculate what is the mass flow rate in the flow blocking direction. Go to Calculate panel 2. Switch to Boundary tab 3. Click the Calculate button 6. In the case of incompressible solvers, the flux is volumetric instead of mass flux. To obtain mass flow rate we have to multiply results by reference density. Reset Result In the next simulation, we will invert flow direction and once again compute the flow rate forced by the same pressure gradient.

    Go back to RUN panel 2. Click Reset Calculation button. This will remove current results and allow to change setting for the second simulation This scheme will be again used for initial calculation since it is less accurate but more stable. Go to Discretization panel 2. Expand the scheme list for U 4.

    Change scheme to Upwind Boundary Conditions -Inverse Pressure Gradient In the second run, we will investigate the results with fluid moving in the opposite direction. Set the Jump value to Run - Next Simulation We leave the rest of the configuration unchanged.

    Now we can start the new calculation. Discretization - Convection Again, after preliminary calculation, we will continue with a more accurate algorithm. Run - Continue Calculation Move back to Run panel and continue calculation. Switch to Residuals tab Slice - Velocity Field As previously change tab to Slices and display velocity field.

    Compare results with previous velocity field. We can see that the velocity level is much higher under the same pressure gradient, which indicates that this configuration results in much smaller resistance. Click Adjust range to data 4. Display the latest results by clicking End button Calculate - Mass Flow Rate Finally, we will calculate the mass flow rate for the second simulation and compare the results.

    This time the value is positive because fluid flows outside the domain. We are interested only in absolute values. Note that this simulation is in 2D, which means that the valve is infinitely wide and does not account the resistance from the side walls. This website uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of cookies.

    Tesla Valve

    Share on Reddit In , Serbian-born inventor Nikola Tesla designed and patented what he called a " valvular conduit ": a pipe whose internal design ensures that a fluid will flow in one preferred direction, with no need for moving parts, making it ideal for microfluidics applications, among other uses.

    According to a recent paper published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B, the Tesla valve also provides a useful model for how food moves through the digestive system of many species of shark.

    Based on new CT scans of shark intestines, scientists have concluded that the intestines are naturally occurring Tesla valves.

    In his patent application , Tesla described this series of 11 flow-control segments as being made of "enlargements, recessions, projections, baffles, or buckets which, while offering virtually no resistant to the passage of fluid in one direction, other than surface friction, constitute an almost impassable barrier to its flow in the opposite direction.

    Tesla claimed that water would flow through his valve times slower in one direction than another, which may have been an exaggeration. A team of scientists at New York University built a working Tesla valve in , in accordance with the inventor's design, and tested that claim by measuring the flow of water through the valve in both directions at various pressures.

    The scientists found the water only flowed about two times slower in the nonpreferred direction. The valve offered very little resistance at slow flow rates, but once that rate increased above a certain threshold, the valve's resistance would increase as well, generating turbulent flows in the reverse direction, thereby "plugging" the pipe with vortices and disruptive currents. Advertisement And now the Tesla valve is providing insight into the unusual structure of shark intestines, thanks to a team of researchers hailing from three universities: California State University, Dominguez Hills, the University of Washington, and the University of California, Irvine.

    Sharks are apex predators, feeding on a wide range of species, and are thus important for controlling biodiversity in the larger ecosystem. Most sharks have spiral intestines consisting of a varying number of folds in the intestinal tissue, typically in one of four basic configurations: columnar, scroll, a funnel pointing to the posterior, or a funnel pointing to the anterior. These four types of intestines are usually depicted in 2D sketches that are splayed out in two dimensions after a dissection or imaged as two-dimensional slices through the three-dimensional structure.

    But that doesn't give scientists much insight into how the structure works in situ. Last year, Japanese researchers reconstructed micrographs of histological sections from a species of catshark into a three-dimensional model, offering "a tantalizing glimpse of the anatomy of a scroll-type spiral intestine," per the authors of this latest paper.

    Co-author Adam Summers, of the University of Washington's Friday Harbor Labs, and his colleagues decided that CT scanning might accomplish something similar, since the technique involves taking a series of X-ray images from different angles and then combining them into 3D images. Two live Pacific spiny dogfish sharks Squalus suckleyi. Leigh et al. It would be like trying to understand what was reported in a newspaper by taking scissors to a rolled-up copy.

    The story just won't hang together. The intestines were removed via dissection, then flushed out with deionized water so they were free of any residual contents. Next, the team filled the specimens with fluid and freeze-dried them to retain their shapes, before scanning them to produce virtual 3D models.

    This gave the researchers an excellent view of how the intestines are structured. Advertisement Next, the team took unfrozen samples of each of the four types of intestines and conducted several experiments. For instance, the researchers ran liquids through the spirals and found it typically took around 35 minutes for the liquids to pass through when they followed the normal direction of flow.

    But the process took twice as long when the intestines were turned upside down, in the opposite direction of normal flow. This is in keeping with the findings of last year's NYU experiments with a Tesla valve. This video shows the soft tissue of a Pacific spiny dogfish Squalus suckleyi spiral intestine, rotated and viewed from different angles. So many guts The team also conducted experiments with five recently euthanized Pacific spiny dogfish.

    The researchers ran colored liquids of varying viscosities through the spiral intestines and observed how the spiral muscles reacted to the liquid. The intestines appeared to slow the movement of food, directing it down through the gut via gravity and contractions of the smooth muscle of the gut.

    However, those contractions mostly served to mix and churn whatever fluids pass through; the intestine's unusual structure is sufficient to move everything along.

    As for why this peculiar intestinal structure may have evolved in the first place, sharks can go days or weeks between large meals. The authors hypothesize that the unusual spiral structure provides an expanded surface area and volume, thereby prolonging the time that food remains in the gut. This increases the absorption of nutrients and also reduces how much energy is needed for sharks to digest their food. The next step is to create 3D-printed models of the different types of shark intestine and run similar experiments.

    We need to look harder at sharks and, in particular, we need to look harder at parts other than the jaws, and the species that don't interact with people.

    100-Year-Old Tesla Valve Is Cool But Not Well Suited For Industry

    The effect is a huge pressure drop, making it very difficult to push the fluid in this direction. After a few seconds, the flow develops a nice slipstream down the middle of the conduit. The blue represents areas with little to no movement. The bulk of the fluid is able to follow a wide and mostly laminar route, and thus the only losses are due to surface friction.

    Tesla quantified the effectiveness of the device by calculating the ratio of resistance in one direction compared to the other. The first simulations were actually half the length of the ones pictured only two segments. In this case, the resistance in the blocking direction was 15 times greater than the unimpeded direction 4. For the four-segment version pictured, the ratio was a whopping While I did not model the full version, it seems plausible that a pressure ratio of could be achieved.

    If the device really worked, why are we not using it to this day?

    Burning Propane Beautifully Illustrates How A Tesla Valve Works

    There, she answers customer requests to develop optimization processes with the software Optimus. The great tutorials, documentation, and personal conversations with support have brought me up to date within 2 months of using SimScale. I am now well versed and use SimScale even with smaller problems to confirm my pre-calculations and to quickly compare design studies. We dream of a future where engineers are able to optimize their designs better and faster.

    We want to be the destination for designers across the globe, by providing a cloud-based simulation tool, educational hub, and collaborative community of innovators. According to a recent paper published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B, the Tesla valve also provides a useful model for how food moves through the digestive system of many species of shark.

    Tesla Valve Design Optimization in SimScale

    Based on new CT scans of shark intestines, scientists have concluded that the intestines are naturally occurring Tesla valves. In his patent applicationTesla described this series of 11 flow-control segments as being made of "enlargements, recessions, projections, baffles, or buckets which, while offering virtually no resistant to the passage of fluid in one direction, other than surface friction, constitute an almost impassable barrier to its flow in the opposite direction.

    Tesla claimed that water would flow through his valve times slower in one direction than another, which may have been an exaggeration. A team of scientists at New York University built a working Tesla valve inin accordance with the inventor's design, and tested that claim by measuring the flow of water through the valve in both directions at various pressures.

    The scientists found the water only flowed about two times slower in the nonpreferred direction.

    tesla valve

    The valve offered very little resistance at slow flow rates, but once that rate increased above a certain threshold, the valve's resistance would increase as well, generating turbulent flows in the reverse direction, thereby "plugging" the pipe with vortices and disruptive currents.

    Advertisement And now the Tesla valve is providing insight into the unusual structure of shark intestines, thanks to a team of researchers hailing from three universities: California State University, Dominguez Hills, the University of Washington, and the University of California, Irvine.

    Sharks are apex predators, feeding on a wide range of species, and are thus important for controlling biodiversity in the larger ecosystem. Most sharks have spiral intestines consisting of a varying number of folds in the intestinal tissue, typically in one of four basic configurations: columnar, scroll, a funnel pointing to the posterior, or a funnel pointing to the anterior.

    These four types of intestines are usually depicted in 2D sketches that are splayed out in two dimensions after a dissection or imaged as two-dimensional slices through the three-dimensional structure.

    But that doesn't give scientists much insight into how the structure works in situ.


    thoughts on “Tesla valve

    1. The question is interesting, I too will take part in discussion. Together we can come to a right answer.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *